Forum Ranks

[NumberXIII]

Friendly Member
Casual Member
Advanced Member
Professional Member
Honored Member
Forum Mentor

if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette
that will be more indetifying lol ;o

[Apple]

Retired [something]
Elder User
Addict [pre/sufix]
Coder
Typo writer
Honored member [or so]

You can give your own title for those above, we already have the last one as Honorary wc3edit traitor.

Spoiler:

Friendly Member
Casual Member
Advanced Member
Professional Member
Honored Member
Forum Mentor

That's redundant we already have

Spoiler:

Post Ranks/Titles:
0-24 Posts: Newcomer
25-49: Junior Member
50-99: Member
100-199: Senior Member
200-299: Old Wrinkly Member
300-399: Forum Fanatic
400-499: Forum Addict
>=500: Forum Spammer

if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette
that will be more indetifying lol ;o

In fact we have female admins and staffs.
I believe we wouldn't differ males and females because this is no online dating forum.

[xXxMKDxXx]

if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette
that will be more indetifying lol ;o

Mehh.. Never seen that. In fact, if the staff does it, the forum should've been deleted.
Administrator, Mod, Super Mod, and then Doctor, Architect and a lots of "ranks/professions" are, errmm. let's say "Unisex"
There ain't no Sex "separation" as for those ranks.

this is no online dating forum.

Agreed!

How about getting rank images for each rank and/or title although it may look dumb together with the online/offline image but it's just for the purpose of entertaining me?
[spoiler="Please kill me for this "]EDIT: Thanks for changing my username!

xXx![/spoiler]

[UndeadxAssassin]

if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette
that will be more indetifying lol ;o

No.

[Nuuby]

if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette
that will be more indetifying lol ;o

No.

Perhaps we shall have a separate forumette.

[Apple]

Perhaps we shall have a separate forumette.

Perhaps no, we shan't. Because the red ones said no ;o

[Bartimaeus]

Separate titles/occupation names for males/females where there isn't a difference in at least the connotations associated with them are retarded, anyways. Queen and King sort of work, as the Queen is generally assumed to be ruler consort, while the king is generally assumed to be ruler regnant. That's not always been true, of course. But for something like actor and actress? Sure, it distinguishes them as being male or female...but there's no difference besides that. Why not writer and writeress, then? Ruler and ruleress? Et cetera.

[Apple]

Separate titles/occupation names for males/females where there isn't a difference in at least the connotations associated with them are retarded, anyways. Queen and King sort of work, as the Queen is generally assumed to be ruler consort, while the king is generally assumed to be ruler regnant. That's not always been true, of course. But for something like actor and actress? Sure, it distinguishes them as being male or female...but there's no difference besides that. Why not writer and writeress, then? Ruler and ruleress? Et cetera.

Bart and Bartress.

[NumberXIII]

apple and apple lol ;p, just wondering why bart is called "Tyrannical Drama Queen" in his title no offense

[Apple]

just wondering why bart is called "Tyrannical Drama Queen" in his title no offense[/size]

Separate titles/occupation names for males/females where there isn't a difference in at least the connotations associated with them are retarded, anyways. Queen and King sort of work, as the Queen is generally assumed to be ruler consort, while the king is generally assumed to be ruler regnant. That's not always been true, of course. But for something like actor and actress? Sure, it distinguishes them as being male or female...but there's no difference besides that. Why not writer and writeress, then? Ruler and ruleress? Et cetera.

get it?

[size=90]apple and apple lol ;p

Apple and Appless.