wc3edit.net https://forum.wc3edit.net/ |
|
Forum Ranks http://forum.wc3edit.net/general-chat-f7/forum-ranks-t26085-10.html |
Page 2 of 3 |
Author: | NumberXIII [ June 21st, 2013, 2:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
Friendly Member Casual Member Advanced Member Professional Member Honored Member Forum Mentor if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette that will be more indetifying lol ;o |
Author: | Apple [ June 21st, 2013, 3:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
xxxmkdxxx wrote: Retired [something] Elder User Addict [pre/sufix] Coder Typo writer Honored member [or so] You can give your own title for those above, we already have the last one as Honorary wc3edit traitor. Spoiler:
That's redundant we already have Spoiler:
NumberXIII wrote: if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette that will be more indetifying lol ;o In fact we have female admins and staffs. I believe we wouldn't differ males and females because this is no online dating forum. |
Author: | xXxMKDxXx [ June 21st, 2013, 1:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
NumberXIII wrote: if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette that will be more indetifying lol ;o Mehh.. Never seen that. In fact, if the staff does it, the forum should've been deleted. Administrator, Mod, Super Mod, and then Doctor, Architect and a lots of "ranks/professions" are, errmm. let's say "Unisex" There ain't no Sex "separation" as for those ranks. Apple wrote: this is no online dating forum. Agreed! How about getting rank images for each rank and/or title although it may look dumb together with the online/offline image but it's just for the purpose of entertaining me? Spoiler for "Please kill me for this ":
|
Author: | UndeadxAssassin [ June 22nd, 2013, 3:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
NumberXIII wrote: if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette that will be more indetifying lol ;o No. |
Author: | Nuuby [ June 22nd, 2013, 8:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
UndeadxAssassin wrote: NumberXIII wrote: if we have female as mods/admins = Moderatorette / Administratorette that will be more indetifying lol ;o No. Perhaps we shall have a separate forumette. |
Author: | Apple [ June 23rd, 2013, 1:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
Nuuby wrote: Perhaps we shall have a separate forumette. Perhaps no, we shan't. Because the red ones said no ;o |
Author: | Bartimaeus [ June 23rd, 2013, 5:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
Separate titles/occupation names for males/females where there isn't a difference in at least the connotations associated with them are retarded, anyways. Queen and King sort of work, as the Queen is generally assumed to be ruler consort, while the king is generally assumed to be ruler regnant. That's not always been true, of course. But for something like actor and actress? Sure, it distinguishes them as being male or female...but there's no difference besides that. Why not writer and writeress, then? Ruler and ruleress? Et cetera. |
Author: | Apple [ June 23rd, 2013, 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
Bartimaeus wrote: Separate titles/occupation names for males/females where there isn't a difference in at least the connotations associated with them are retarded, anyways. Queen and King sort of work, as the Queen is generally assumed to be ruler consort, while the king is generally assumed to be ruler regnant. That's not always been true, of course. But for something like actor and actress? Sure, it distinguishes them as being male or female...but there's no difference besides that. Why not writer and writeress, then? Ruler and ruleress? Et cetera. Bart and Bartress. |
Author: | NumberXIII [ June 23rd, 2013, 11:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
apple and apple lol ;p, just wondering why bart is called "Tyrannical Drama Queen" in his title no offense |
Author: | Apple [ June 23rd, 2013, 11:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Forum Ranks |
NumberXIII wrote: just wondering why bart is called "Tyrannical Drama Queen" in his title no offense[/size] Bartimaeus wrote: Separate titles/occupation names for males/females where there isn't a difference in at least the connotations associated with them are retarded, anyways. Queen and King sort of work, as the Queen is generally assumed to be ruler consort, while the king is generally assumed to be ruler regnant. That's not always been true, of course. But for something like actor and actress? Sure, it distinguishes them as being male or female...but there's no difference besides that. Why not writer and writeress, then? Ruler and ruleress? Et cetera. get it? NumberXIII wrote: [size=90]apple and apple lol ;p Apple and Appless. |
Page 2 of 3 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |