CS:S EnhancedAim Hack (Best Hack)

[alpus_dota_KOR]

Best CS:S Hax

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q68zQR8ZY_c

EnhancedAim's Profile:

http://www.youtube.com/user/EnhancedAim

Its fun to play with hacks BTW i am back in wc3edit.net

[JJ2197]

Well you don't really want to have a really good h4x... you just need something that
can help, otherwise playing like that, is going to get you banned real fast, unless of
course you can find a nice unsecure server (or host your own). Though
what I found that was fun was just getting any hack that has wallhack and aimhack
(one that can aim at differnt body parts) and pretty much try not to make it obvious.
Though watch out for ones that make your screen shake when someone is spectating
you, that was always an easy indicator that someone was a hacker.

[Bartimaeus]

That's an awful hack. If there's an admin, you're going to get banned in one round it's so obvious. The best hack is the one that no one can detect or prove.

However, hacks, in general, are really lame, so...I guess the best hack is the one that's patched,

[YellowAfterlife]

Indeed, this is too obvious.
A proper hack should work different:
* don't do a total takeover the view rotation
* while the user turns around, and there's a foe object within certain radius on-screen (screen_width/8?), start adding mouse velocity towards that point (so, if someone is watching your view, it would look just like you're changing your opinion).
* Once there's a foe under the crosshair, wait a random number of frames (1-5, to emulate varying user reaction time), and shoot.
If done properly, hack would be possible to detect only at software level (by presense of process\data modification).
But saying all this does not increase chances of appearance of such hack too much (sadly)

[mokarecman]

Even if you play with a hack on cs, ill still beat you.

Yes i'm that good

[matchai]

Indeed, this is too obvious.
A proper hack should work different:
* don't do a total takeover the view rotation
* while the user turns around, and there's a foe object within certain radius on-screen (screen_width/8?), start adding mouse velocity towards that point (so, if someone is watching your view, it would look just like you're changing your opinion).
* Once there's a foe under the crosshair, wait a random number of frames (1-5, to emulate varying user reaction time), and shoot.
If done properly, hack would be possible to detect only at software level (by presense of process\data modification).
But saying all this does not increase chances of appearance of such hack too much (sadly)

You seem to have a large vocabulary and knowledge about the subject of which you are speaking... Based on solely that I am going to say that you have the potential to learn to program (if you don't know how) and make this aimbot. Once you do I will reward you with a smiling emoticon and all will be well.

[mokarecman]

Indeed, this is too obvious.
A proper hack should work different:
* don't do a total takeover the view rotation
* while the user turns around, and there's a foe object within certain radius on-screen (screen_width/8?), start adding mouse velocity towards that point (so, if someone is watching your view, it would look just like you're changing your opinion).
* Once there's a foe under the crosshair, wait a random number of frames (1-5, to emulate varying user reaction time), and shoot.
If done properly, hack would be possible to detect only at software level (by presense of process\data modification).
But saying all this does not increase chances of appearance of such hack too much (sadly)

You seem to have a large vocabulary and knowledge about the subject of which you are speaking... Based on solely that I am going to say that you have the potential to learn to program (if you don't know how) and make this aimbot. Once you do I will reward you with a smiling emoticon and all will be well.

Spam of the highest quality.

[matchai]

Indeed, this is too obvious.
A proper hack should work different:
* don't do a total takeover the view rotation
* while the user turns around, and there's a foe object within certain radius on-screen (screen_width/8?), start adding mouse velocity towards that point (so, if someone is watching your view, it would look just like you're changing your opinion).
* Once there's a foe under the crosshair, wait a random number of frames (1-5, to emulate varying user reaction time), and shoot.
If done properly, hack would be possible to detect only at software level (by presense of process\data modification).
But saying all this does not increase chances of appearance of such hack too much (sadly)

You seem to have a large vocabulary and knowledge about the subject of which you are speaking... Based on solely that I am going to say that you have the potential to learn to program (if you don't know how) and make this aimbot. Once you do I will reward you with a smiling emoticon and all will be well.

Spam of the highest quality.

...My post wasn't spam. I was making a joke. I am sorry that you don't have a sense of humor. You on the other hand did make a spam post which wasn't necessary at all. This is the General Section and as long as your post doesn't go off topic it's fine (to an extent). You just decided to ... with a mod... Bad move on your part. Seeing as I am somewhat generous I will not warn you for your useless post. Instead I will PM you a picture of a platypus.

[mokarecman]

...My post wasn't spam. I was making a joke. I am sorry that you don't have a sense of humor. You on the other hand did make a spam post which wasn't necessary at all. This is the General Section and as long as your post doesn't go off topic it's fine (to an extent). You just decided to ... with a mod... Bad move on your part. Seeing as I am somewhat generous I will not warn you for your useless post. Instead I will PM you a picture of a platypus.

The joke's on you be cuz i was making a joke too.
Educate yourself.
http://www.wikihow.com/Be-Funny

[Bushido]

Nice off-topic.
Closed.
This thread is pointless anyway.