Vegas wrote:
FatherSpace wrote:
You're wrong.
If one died, he would have one left, but could not be Two. In fact, it could be Three. Or Vegas. The names of either would be irrelevant in that case.
No, thats not right at all grasshopper. I understand the guy screwed it up to begin with because he didnt have caps on for one and two. But as it stands right now, if "One" died, "Two" would be left.
While it is true that if "One" died, "Two" would be left...but in his post he says that one died, not "One". Therefore, he is, in fact, correct. (Although better grammar would dictate that he use "doesn't have to be Two" instead of "could not be Two")
Semantics
. I love them.
_________________
Quote:
(20:53:52) Bartimaeus: Thank you, Jen.
(20:53:56) Bartimaeus: Truly, you are wise.
Quote:
(23:44:12) Bartimaeus: I was in pubic school until middle school...
Learn how to extract and read RAW Codes here!Need help? Click here and ask your question!