Ozzapoo wrote:
Are you a moron? I did not even mention game caches in my last post. I was merely commenting on you thinking that someone has hacked Dekar's account simply because he asked a question?
On the topic of collision, I must have read wrong, I thought cache modification was removed as well, seems not. But Blizzard is not the one to blame, honestly. The stupid people leaking things to the public on a mass scale are. Who in their right mind would tell everyone about the hex code execution? Then Blizzard has to trouble everyone by fixing it.. I was always opposed to publicising things like that, but some people seem to think otherwise. Oh well, screw them.
Are you an idiot? You didn't mention game caches the last game but you did mention game caches on one of your post. And I have asked that questions on everywhere and you didn't give me an answer. So it's obviously a questions that should be answered a long time ago.
And you keep yelling at me in this and that. What's the fucking point?
Now you answered me about the game cache thingie. "You must have heard it wrong huh?"
Why can't you answer it earlier? I have searched all other websties just to see where they've mentioned about blizzard fixing game caches and I didn't find it. So again it's my fault believing your idiotic words?
Though bypassing the checksum has nothing to do with "collisions" but it depends on how you define the word "collisions"! Dekar's PM did use the word "collide" And when I am talking about collisions in patch 1.23 why is it so hard for you to understand what I was talking about?
So now people CAN bypass the checksum and use cache cheats on patch 1.23. What is wrong with the statement "collisions continue"?
Also, Dekar used the word "collide" and I don't think it's wrong? By bypassing wc3 it allows you to use cache cheats, why can't we use the word "collide". It's the same concept how those cheats are runned.
Ok now, all this arguement was just because of the defination. Collide is not "collide"
Funny huh? And don't forget what you told me when I asked you if you can use a collided map on patch 1.23. You said yes, but one have to be a host to do so. Why didn't you just answer me and said "No, I can't collide, I can only bypassing the checksum."?
Huh? You thought it's logic to say you can play a collided map on patch 1.23 a few month ago but now you tell me I was bullshitting saying it? What's the logic?
And seriously, stop taking drugs. Holy shit you are a bad guy in this forums.
Dekar wrote:
Yeah it was my post, if you don't believe me just mail me and I'll answer you that it was my post -.-
And there are no collisions on sha1 so far - there probably won't be "cheap" (costs < 10k$) ones for the next decades.
There are ways to get around the checksum ofc, but they have nothing to do with collisions!
You said that on the PM: the way to make it "collided" are complately different.
Of course it's different, but you still used the word "collide" in the PM, and then suddenly you said it's not possible to "collided". One word with different definations. You have changed your mind about the defination of the word. So it would be logic if I think it's 2 different person.
Rnbby did say it once he got a collided map that work on patch 1.23. He was probably just trash talking. I saw cache cheats on patch 1.23. I didn't know if it was the host using cache cheats. I was just thinking it might be rnbby's map. But since you say it so surely it's not possible then it had to be the host who was using cache cheat.
p/s rnbby disappeared? Name changed? Not seeing his post for a decade.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Chat
Fileserver
